↓ Skip to main content

Impact of long-term lifestyle programmes on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight/obese participants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,413)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
5 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of long-term lifestyle programmes on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight/obese participants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas Schwingshackl, Sofia Dias, Georg Hoffmann

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term efficacy of diet plus exercise (D + E) vs. diet (D), D + E vs. exercise (E) and D vs. E on anthropometric outcomes and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese participants.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Other 10 6%
Other 43 27%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 31%
Sports and Recreations 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 24 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#197,012
of 15,917,790 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#21
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,188
of 235,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,917,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.