↓ Skip to main content

What is the impact of active management on biodiversity in forests set aside for conservation or restoration? A systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is the impact of active management on biodiversity in forests set aside for conservation or restoration? A systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-3-22
Authors

Claes Bernes, Bengt Jonsson, Kaisa Junninen, Asko Lõhmus, Ellen Macdonald, Jörg Müller, Jennie Sandström

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 36%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,009,138
of 15,575,554 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#171
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,090
of 235,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,575,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them