↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Fishes through DNA Barcodes and Microarrays

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying Fishes through DNA Barcodes and Microarrays
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Kochzius, Christian Seidel, Aglaia Antoniou, Sandeep Kumar Botla, Daniel Campo, Alessia Cariani, Eva Garcia Vazquez, Janet Hauschild, Caroline Hervet, Sigridur Hjörleifsdottir, Gudmundur Hreggvidsson, Kristina Kappel, Monica Landi, Antonios Magoulas, Viggo Marteinsson, Manfred Nölte, Serge Planes, Fausto Tinti, Cemal Turan, Moleyur N. Venugopal, Hannes Weber, Dietmar Blohm

Abstract

International fish trade reached an import value of 62.8 billion Euro in 2006, of which 44.6% are covered by the European Union. Species identification is a key problem throughout the life cycle of fishes: from eggs and larvae to adults in fisheries research and control, as well as processed fish products in consumer protection.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Cambodia 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 409 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 20%
Student > Master 81 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 18%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 4%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 61 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 229 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 14%
Environmental Science 40 9%
Computer Science 4 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 <1%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 71 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,933,954
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,997
of 194,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,651
of 95,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#206
of 875 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 875 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.