↓ Skip to main content

Creatine for treating muscle disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Creatine for treating muscle disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004760.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kley RA, Tarnopolsky MA, Vorgerd M

Abstract

Progressive muscle weakness is a main symptom of most hereditary and acquired muscle diseases. Creatine improves muscle performance in healthy individuals. This is an update of our 2007 Cochrane review that evaluated creatine treatment in muscle disorders.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 38%
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,846,745
of 14,669,094 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,607
of 11,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,087
of 233,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#186
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,669,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.