↓ Skip to main content

Parental decision making around perinatal autopsy: a qualitative investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Health Expectations, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parental decision making around perinatal autopsy: a qualitative investigation
Published in
Health Expectations, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/hex.12305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Meaney, Stephen Gallagher, Jennifer E Lutomski, Keelin O'Donoghue

Abstract

Decades of decline in uptake rates of perinatal autopsies has limited investigation into the causes and risk factors for stillbirth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 20%
Psychology 8 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,006,587
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from Health Expectations
#265
of 1,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,967
of 269,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Expectations
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.