↓ Skip to main content

Cordilleran Ice Sheet mass loss preceded climate reversals near the Pleistocene Termination

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
46 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cordilleran Ice Sheet mass loss preceded climate reversals near the Pleistocene Termination
Published in
Science, November 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aan3001
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Menounos, B. M. Goehring, G. Osborn, M. Margold, B. Ward, J. Bond, G. K. C. Clarke, J. J. Clague, T. Lakeman, J. Koch, M. W. Caffee, J. Gosse, A. P. Stroeven, J. Seguinot, J. Heyman

Abstract

The Cordilleran Ice Sheet (CIS) once covered an area comparable to that of Greenland. Previous geologic evidence and numerical models indicate that the ice sheet covered much of westernmost Canada as late as 12.5 thousand years ago (ka). New data indicate that substantial areas throughout westernmost Canada were ice free prior to 12.5 ka and some as early as 14.0 ka, with implications for climate dynamics and the timing of meltwater discharge to the Pacific and Arctic oceans. Early Bølling-Allerød warmth halved the mass of the CIS in as little as 500 years, causing 2.5 to 3.0 meters of sea-level rise. Dozens of cirque and valley glaciers, along with the southern margin of the CIS, advanced into recently deglaciated regions during the Bølling-Allerød and Younger Dryas.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Researcher 19 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 65 60%
Environmental Science 11 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 20 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#88,026
of 15,813,114 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,482
of 67,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,480
of 323,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#150
of 1,099 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,813,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,099 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.