You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The compadre Plant Matrix Database: an open online repository for plant demography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ecology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2745.12334 |
| Authors |
Roberto Salguero‐Gómez, Owen R. Jones, C. Ruth Archer, Yvonne M. Buckley, Judy Che‐Castaldo, Hal Caswell, David Hodgson, Alexander Scheuerlein, Dalia A. Conde, Erik Brinks, Hendrik de Buhr, Claudia Farack, Fränce Gottschalk, Alexander Hartmann, Anne Henning, Gabriel Hoppe, Gesa Römer, Jens Runge, Tara Ruoff, Julia Wille, Stefan Zeh, Raziel Davison, Dirk Vieregg, Annette Baudisch, Res Altwegg, Fernando Colchero, Ming Dong, Hans de Kroon, Jean‐Dominique Lebreton, Charlotte J. E. Metcalf, Maile M. Neel, Ingrid M. Parker, Takenori Takada, Teresa Valverde, Luis A. Vélez‐Espino, Glenda M. Wardle, Miguel Franco, James W. Vaupel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 17% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Australia | 6 | 9% |
| Finland | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 65% |
| Scientists | 17 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 373 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 28% |
| Researcher | 99 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 175 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 101 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Unknown | 75 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2017.
All research outputs
#408,266
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#44
of 3,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,214
of 276,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.