↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNA expression profiling and Notch1 and Notch2 expression in minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNA expression profiling and Notch1 and Notch2 expression in minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-12-334
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heejeong Lee, Kyu Rae Kim, Nam Hoon Cho, Sung Ran Hong, Hoiseon Jeong, Sun Young Kwon, Kwang Hwa Park, Hee Jung An, Tae Heon Kim, Insun Kim, Hye Kyoung Yoon, Kwang Sun Suh, Ki Ouk Min, Hyun Joo Choi, Ji Young Park, Chong Woo Yoo, Youn Soo Lee, Hee Jin Lee, Weon Sun Lee, Chul Soo Park, Yonghee Lee

Abstract

MicroRNA (miRNA) expression is known to be deregulated in cervical carcinomas. However, no data is available about the miRNA expression pattern for the minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA) of uterine cervix. We sought to detect deregulated miRNAs in MDA in an attempt to find the most dependable miRNA or their combinations to understand their tumorigenesis pathway and to identify diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. We also investigated the association between those miRNAs and their target genes, especially Notch1 and Notch2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,731,162
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#871
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,610
of 263,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#50
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.