↓ Skip to main content

Reviving common standards in point-count surveys for broad inference across studies

Overview of attention for article published in Ornithological Applications, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reviving common standards in point-count surveys for broad inference across studies
Published in
Ornithological Applications, October 2014
DOI 10.1650/condor-14-108.1
Authors

Steven M. Matsuoka, C. Lisa Mahon, Colleen M. Handel, Pter Slymos, Erin M. Bayne, Patricia C. Fontaine, C. John Ralph

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 198 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 25%
Student > Master 47 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 9 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 53%
Environmental Science 52 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 33 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,505,212
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#163
of 2,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,173
of 274,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.