↓ Skip to main content

The promise and challenges of exploiting the proton-coupled folate transporter for selective therapeutic targeting of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The promise and challenges of exploiting the proton-coupled folate transporter for selective therapeutic targeting of cancer
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00280-017-3473-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larry H. Matherly, Zhanjun Hou, Aleem Gangjee

Abstract

This review considers the "promise" of exploiting the proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT) for selective therapeutic targeting of cancer. PCFT was discovered in 2006 and was identified as the principal folate transporter involved in the intestinal absorption of dietary folates. The recognition that PCFT was highly expressed in many tumors stimulated substantial interest in using PCFT for cytotoxic drug targeting, taking advantage of its high level transport activity under the acidic pH conditions that characterize many tumors. For pemetrexed, among the best PCFT substrates, transport by PCFT establishes its importance as a clinically important transporter in malignant pleural mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer. In recent years, the notion of PCFT-targeting has been extended to a new generation of tumor-targeted 6-substituted pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine compounds that are structurally and functionally distinct from pemetrexed, and that exhibit near exclusive transport by PCFT and potent inhibition of de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis. Based on compelling preclinical evidence in a wide range of human tumor models, it is now time to advance the most optimized PCFT-targeted agents with the best balance of PCFT transport specificity and potent antitumor efficacy to the clinic to validate this novel paradigm of highly selective tumor targeting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Student > Bachelor 5 22%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#21,164,509
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#2,211
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,518
of 330,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.