You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-72 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Jenni Labarthe, France Légaré, Mathieu Ouimet, Carole A Estabrooks, Geneviève Roch, El Kebir Ghandour, Jeremy Grimshaw |
| Abstract |
Knowledge translation (KT) is an imperative in order to implement research-based and contextualized practices that can answer the numerous challenges of complex health problems. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) provides a conceptual framework to guide the implementation process in chronic care. Yet, organizations aiming to improve chronic care require an adequate level of organizational readiness (OR) for KT. Available instruments on organizational readiness for change (ORC) have shown limited validity, and are not tailored or adapted to specific phases of the knowledge-to-action (KTA) process. We aim to develop an evidence-based, comprehensive, and valid instrument to measure OR for KT in healthcare. The OR for KT instrument will be based on core concepts retrieved from existing literature and validated by a Delphi study. We will specifically test the instrument in chronic care that is of an increasing importance for the health system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 18% |
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 12% |
| Psychology | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,203,930
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,210
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,292
of 116,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.