↓ Skip to main content

Hoarding disorder: a new diagnostic category in ICD-11?

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hoarding disorder: a new diagnostic category in ICD-11?
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonardo F. Fontenelle, Jon E. Grant

Abstract

Despite the long-held view that hoarding is a symptom of both obsessive-compulsive disorder and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, increased evidence has emerged during the last 20 years suggesting that hoarding represents a distinct form of psychopathology. This study reflects the discussions on the nosological status of hoarding carried out by the WHO ICD-11 Working Group on the Classification of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. The distinctiveness of hoarding is based on its having core symptoms that differ from those of other disorders, as well as distinctive neurobiological correlates and treatment responses. Furthermore, data showing the clinical utility, global applicability, and appropriateness of the concept of hoarding disorder outside specialty mental health settings suggest that this condition should be included in ICD-11. Finally, given the focus of ICD-11 on primary care and public health, the Working Group suggests that poor insight and severe domestic squalor may be considered as specifiers for hoarding disorder in ICD-11.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 16 28%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 28%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 10 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#12,906,172
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#353
of 843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,770
of 305,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.