↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics of physical activity programs in the Brazilian primary health care system

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics of physical activity programs in the Brazilian primary health care system
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, October 2014
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00085713
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace Angélica de Oliveira Gomes, Eduardo Kokubun, Grégore Iven Mieke, Luiz Roberto Ramos, Michael Pratt, Diana C. Parra, Eduardo Simões, Alex A. Florindo, Mario Bracco, Danielle Cruz, Deborah Malta, Felipe Lobelo, Pedro C. Hallal

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of programs that promote physical activity in the public primary care system by region of Brazil, subject to the presence or absence of multidisciplinary primary care teams (NASF). We conducted a cross sectional and population-based telephone survey of the health unit coordinators from 1,251 health care units. Coordinators were asked about the presence and characteristics of physical activity programs. Four out of ten health units reported having a physical activity intervention program, the most common involving walking groups. Most of the activities were performed in the morning, once or twice a week, and in sessions of 30 minutes or more. Physical education professionals were primarily responsible for directing the activities. Interventions occurred in the health unit itself or in adjacent community spaces. In general, these characteristics were similar between units with or without NASF, but varied substantially across regions. These findings will guide future physical activity policies and programs within primary care in Brazil.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 7 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 19 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,565
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,190
of 265,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.