↓ Skip to main content

Global Disease Monitoring and Forecasting with Wikipedia

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
58 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
13 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global Disease Monitoring and Forecasting with Wikipedia
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003892
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Generous, Geoffrey Fairchild, Alina Deshpande, Sara Y. Del Valle, Reid Priedhorsky

Abstract

Infectious disease is a leading threat to public health, economic stability, and other key social structures. Efforts to mitigate these impacts depend on accurate and timely monitoring to measure the risk and progress of disease. Traditional, biologically-focused monitoring techniques are accurate but costly and slow; in response, new techniques based on social internet data, such as social media and search queries, are emerging. These efforts are promising, but important challenges in the areas of scientific peer review, breadth of diseases and countries, and forecasting hamper their operational usefulness. We examine a freely available, open data source for this use: access logs from the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Using linear models, language as a proxy for location, and a systematic yet simple article selection procedure, we tested 14 location-disease combinations and demonstrate that these data feasibly support an approach that overcomes these challenges. Specifically, our proof-of-concept yields models with r2 up to 0.92, forecasting value up to the 28 days tested, and several pairs of models similar enough to suggest that transferring models from one location to another without re-training is feasible. Based on these preliminary results, we close with a research agenda designed to overcome these challenges and produce a disease monitoring and forecasting system that is significantly more effective, robust, and globally comprehensive than the current state of the art.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 239 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 28%
Researcher 57 22%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 27 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 60 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 14%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Mathematics 12 5%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 40 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#186,447
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#125
of 9,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,697
of 271,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#6
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.