↓ Skip to main content

PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009519.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mia Schmidt-Hansen, David R Baldwin, Elise Hasler, Javier Zamora, Víctor Abraira, Marta Roqué i Figuls

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 27%
Unspecified 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Other 46 27%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 54%
Unspecified 34 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,960,264
of 13,606,441 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,643
of 10,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,620
of 231,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,606,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.