↓ Skip to main content

Applications of Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning to Biological Data

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 3,434)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
72 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
638 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
850 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applications of Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning to Biological Data
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, January 2018
DOI 10.1109/tnnls.2018.2790388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahmud, Mohammed Shamim Kaiser, Amir Hussain, Stefano Vassanelli

Abstract

Rapid advances in hardware-based technologies during the past decades have opened up new possibilities for life scientists to gather multimodal data in various application domains, such as omics, bioimaging, medical imaging, and (brain/body)-machine interfaces. These have generated novel opportunities for development of dedicated data-intensive machine learning techniques. In particular, recent research in deep learning (DL), reinforcement learning (RL), and their combination (deep RL) promise to revolutionize the future of artificial intelligence. The growth in computational power accompanied by faster and increased data storage, and declining computing costs have already allowed scientists in various fields to apply these techniques on data sets that were previously intractable owing to their size and complexity. This paper provides a comprehensive survey on the application of DL, RL, and deep RL techniques in mining biological data. In addition, we compare the performances of DL techniques when applied to different data sets across various application domains. Finally, we outline open issues in this challenging research area and discuss future development perspectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 850 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 850 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 17%
Student > Master 107 13%
Student > Bachelor 82 10%
Researcher 77 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 4%
Other 130 15%
Unknown 278 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 193 23%
Engineering 157 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 2%
Other 109 13%
Unknown 313 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#909,642
of 26,110,873 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
#13
of 3,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,828
of 453,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
#2
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,110,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.