You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence
|
---|---|
Published by |
The National Academies Press, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.17226/18319 |
ISBNs |
978-0-309-28438-7, 978-0-309-28439-4, 978-0-309-28440-0, 978-0-309-28442-4, 978-0-309-28441-7
|
Authors |
Alan I. Leshner, Bruce M. Altevogt, Arlene F. Lee, Margaret A. McCoy, and Patrick W. Kelley, Editors; Committee on Priorities for a Public Health Research Agenda to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence; Executive Office, Institute of Medicine; Committee on Law and Justice; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Institute of Medicine; National Research Council, Institute of Medicine and |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1195 | 39% |
Canada | 38 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 22 | <1% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 12 | <1% |
Curaçao | 11 | <1% |
Georgia | 11 | <1% |
Comoros | 10 | <1% |
Brazil | 6 | <1% |
Germany | 6 | <1% |
Other | 94 | 3% |
Unknown | 1697 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2914 | 94% |
Scientists | 66 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 47 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 39 | 1% |
Unknown | 36 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 6% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
Professor | 11 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 9% |
Other | 35 | 27% |
Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 31 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 20% |
Psychology | 15 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3520. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,625
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#6
of 10,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3
of 221,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#1
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.