↓ Skip to main content

Neurosurgical interventions for the treatment of classical trigeminal neuralgia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurosurgical interventions for the treatment of classical trigeminal neuralgia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007312.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna M Zakrzewska, Harith Akram

Abstract

Surgical interventions are used for trigeminal neuralgia when drug treatment fails. Surgical treatments divide into two main categories, ablative (destructive) or non-ablative. These treatments can be done at three different sites: peripherally, at the Gasserian ganglion level, and within the posterior fossa of the skull.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 229%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 157%
Student > Bachelor 10 143%
Student > Postgraduate 6 86%
Unspecified 5 71%
Other 18 257%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 614%
Unspecified 7 100%
Psychology 6 86%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 57%
Neuroscience 2 29%
Other 4 57%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,403,284
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,704
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,235
of 286,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.