↓ Skip to main content

H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006137.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maulina Sharma, Cathy Bennett, Stuart N Cohen, Ben Carter

Abstract

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterised by the development of crops of red, itchy, raised weals or hives with no identifiable external cause.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 212 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Researcher 17 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 50 23%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Psychology 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 47 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,570,577
of 15,341,807 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,071
of 11,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,566
of 304,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,341,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.