Title |
Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1098/rsif.2014.0873 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G. Petri, P. Expert, F. Turkheimer, R. Carhart-Harris, D. Nutt, P. J. Hellyer, F. Vaccarino |
Abstract |
Networks, as efficient representations of complex systems, have appealed to scientists for a long time and now permeate many areas of science, including neuroimaging (Bullmore and Sporns 2009 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186-198. (doi:10.1038/nrn2618)). Traditionally, the structure of complex networks has been studied through their statistical properties and metrics concerned with node and link properties, e.g. degree-distribution, node centrality and modularity. Here, we study the characteristics of functional brain networks at the mesoscopic level from a novel perspective that highlights the role of inhomogeneities in the fabric of functional connections. This can be done by focusing on the features of a set of topological objects-homological cycles-associated with the weighted functional network. We leverage the detected topological information to define the homological scaffolds, a new set of objects designed to represent compactly the homological features of the correlation network and simultaneously make their homological properties amenable to networks theoretical methods. As a proof of principle,we apply these tools to compare resting state functional brain activity in 15 healthy volunteers after intravenous infusion of placebo and psilocybin-the main psychoactive component of magic mushrooms. The results show that the homological structure of the brain's functional patterns undergoes a dramatic change post-psilocybin, characterized by the appearance of many transient structures of low stability and of a small number of persistent ones that are not observed in the case of placebo. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 73 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 35 | 10% |
Canada | 9 | 3% |
Japan | 8 | 2% |
Mexico | 6 | 2% |
Switzerland | 5 | 1% |
Spain | 5 | 1% |
Australia | 5 | 1% |
Ireland | 4 | 1% |
Other | 43 | 13% |
Unknown | 146 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 251 | 74% |
Scientists | 55 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 2% |
Unknown | 510 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 86 | 16% |
Student > Master | 79 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 14% |
Researcher | 70 | 13% |
Other | 22 | 4% |
Other | 85 | 16% |
Unknown | 115 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 82 | 15% |
Psychology | 77 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 7% |
Mathematics | 29 | 5% |
Other | 134 | 25% |
Unknown | 130 | 24% |