You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interactions Among Invasive Plants: Lessons from Hawai‘i
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022620 |
| Authors |
Carla M. D'Antonio, Rebecca Ostertag, Susan Cordell, Stephanie Yelenik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,747,934
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#563
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,396
of 341,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.