↓ Skip to main content

Precision Medicine, CRISPR, and Genome Engineering

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Target Discovery for Precision Medicine Using High-Throughput Genome Engineering
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Target Discovery for Precision Medicine Using High-Throughput Genome Engineering
Chapter number 7
Book title
Precision Medicine, CRISPR, and Genome Engineering
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63904-8_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-963903-1, 978-3-31-963904-8
Authors

Xinyi Guo, Poonam Chitale, Neville E. Sanjana

Abstract

Over the past few years, programmable RNA-guided nucleases such as the CRISPR/Cas9 system have ushered in a new era of precision genome editing in diverse model systems and in human cells. Functional screens using large libraries of RNA guides can interrogate a large hypothesis space to pinpoint particular genes and genetic elements involved in fundamental biological processes and disease-relevant phenotypes. Here, we review recent high-throughput CRISPR screens (e.g. loss-of-function, gain-of-function, and targeting noncoding elements) and highlight their potential for uncovering novel therapeutic targets, such as those involved in cancer resistance to small molecular drugs and immunotherapies, tumor evolution, infectious disease, inborn genetic disorders, and other therapeutic challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,782,362
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#886
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,578
of 421,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#84
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.