↓ Skip to main content

Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00429-010-0261-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Ullsperger, Helga A. Harsay, Jan R. Wessel, K. Richard Ridderinkhof

Abstract

To detect erroneous action outcomes is necessary for flexible adjustments and therefore a prerequisite of adaptive, goal-directed behavior. While performance monitoring has been studied intensively over two decades and a vast amount of knowledge on its functional neuroanatomy has been gathered, much less is known about conscious error perception, often referred to as error awareness. Here, we review and discuss the conditions under which error awareness occurs, its neural correlates and underlying functional neuroanatomy. We focus specifically on the anterior insula, which has been shown to be (a) reliably activated during performance monitoring and (b) modulated by error awareness. Anterior insular activity appears to be closely related to autonomic responses associated with consciously perceived errors, although the causality and directions of these relationships still needs to be unraveled. We discuss the role of the anterior insula in generating versus perceiving autonomic responses and as a key player in balancing effortful task-related and resting-state activity. We suggest that errors elicit reactions highly reminiscent of an orienting response and may thus induce the autonomic arousal needed to recruit the required mental and physical resources. We discuss the role of norepinephrine activity in eliciting sufficiently strong central and autonomic nervous responses enabling the necessary adaptation as well as conscious error perception.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Italy 5 1%
Germany 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 462 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 134 27%
Researcher 88 18%
Student > Master 64 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 7%
Student > Bachelor 27 5%
Other 93 19%
Unknown 58 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 212 42%
Neuroscience 80 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 6%
Engineering 12 2%
Other 46 9%
Unknown 86 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,786,084
of 25,381,151 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#299
of 1,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,516
of 105,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.