↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reproducibility of measures of oropharyngeal dysphagia in preschool children with cerebral palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reproducibility of measures of oropharyngeal dysphagia in preschool children with cerebral palsy
Published in
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/dmcn.12616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine A Benfer, Kelly A Weir, Kristie L Bell, Robert S Ware, Peter SW Davies, Roslyn N Boyd

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the best measure to discriminate between those with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) and those without OPD, among young children with cerebral palsy (CP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 26 27%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 22%
Psychology 8 8%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,644,315
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#2,682
of 4,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,624
of 268,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#24
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.