You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevention of Early Postnatal Hyperalimentation Protects against Activation of Transforming Growth Factor-β/Bone Morphogenetic Protein and Interleukin-6 Signaling in Rat Lungs after Intrauterine Growth Restriction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nutrition, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3945/jn.114.197657 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel Angel Alejandre Alcázar, Katharina Dinger, Eva Rother, Iris Östreicher, Christina Vohlen, Christian Plank, Jörg Dötsch |
| Abstract |
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is intimately linked with postnatal catch-up growth, leading to impaired lung structure and function. However, the impact of catch-up growth induced by early postnatal hyperalimentation (HA) on the lung has not been addressed to date. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#7,912
of 9,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,086
of 265,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#56
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.