↓ Skip to main content

Restricted versus liberal oxygen exposure for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restricted versus liberal oxygen exposure for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001077.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa M Askie, David J Henderson-Smart, Henry Ko

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 10 10%
Unspecified 8 8%
Other 35 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 71%
Unspecified 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 8 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,773,842
of 12,498,628 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,650
of 8,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,820
of 283,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#184
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,498,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.