↓ Skip to main content

Smart home technologies for health and social care support

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Smart home technologies for health and social care support
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006412.pub2
Authors

Suzanne Martin, Greg Kelly, W George Kernohan, Bernadette McCreight, Christopher Nugent

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Canada 3 <1%
Bangladesh 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 314 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 18%
Researcher 55 16%
Student > Master 50 15%
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 40 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 23%
Computer Science 49 14%
Social Sciences 43 13%
Psychology 29 9%
Engineering 24 7%
Other 68 20%
Unknown 51 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,767,367
of 14,332,879 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,490
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,021
of 301,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,332,879 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.