↓ Skip to main content

Aspiration of the elbow joint for treating radial head fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aspiration of the elbow joint for treating radial head fractures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009949.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thanit Foocharoen, Chingching Foocharoen, Malinee Laopaiboon, Thavatchai Tiamklang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 11 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,580,893
of 14,155,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,424
of 10,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,537
of 300,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,155,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.