↓ Skip to main content

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006640.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bennett C, Klingenberg SL, Langholz E, Gluud LL, Bennett, Cathy, Klingenberg, Sarah Louise, Langholz, Ebbe, Gluud, Lise Lotte

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 29%
Other 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 71%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#569,023
of 11,581,964 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,129
of 9,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,223
of 247,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,581,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.