↓ Skip to main content

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006640.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy Bennett, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Ebbe Langholz, Lise Lotte Gluud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Other 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 24 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#554,821
of 14,540,762 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,597
of 10,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,071
of 301,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,540,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.