↓ Skip to main content

Origin of the unusually strong and selective binding of vanadium by polyamidoximes in seawater

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origin of the unusually strong and selective binding of vanadium by polyamidoximes in seawater
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01443-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander S. Ivanov, Christina J. Leggett, Bernard F. Parker, Zhicheng Zhang, John Arnold, Sheng Dai, Carter W. Abney, Vyacheslav S. Bryantsev, Linfeng Rao

Abstract

Amidoxime-functionalized polymeric adsorbents are the current state-of-the-art materials for collecting uranium (U) from seawater. However, marine tests show that vanadium (V) is preferentially extracted over U and many other cations. Herein, we report a complementary and comprehensive investigation integrating ab initio simulations with thermochemical titrations and XAFS spectroscopy to understand the unusually strong and selective binding of V by polyamidoximes. While the open-chain amidoxime functionalities do not bind V, the cyclic imide-dioxime group of the adsorbent forms a peculiar non-oxido V(5+) complex, exhibiting the highest stability constant value ever observed for the V(5+) species. XAFS analysis of adsorbents following deployment in environmental seawater confirms V binding solely by the imide-dioximes. Our fundamental findings offer not only guidance for future optimization of selectivity in amidoxime-based sorbent materials, but may also afford insight to understanding the extensive accumulation of V in some marine organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 20 41%
Chemical Engineering 6 12%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,781,549
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#22,385
of 46,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,606
of 293,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#699
of 1,457 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,457 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.