↓ Skip to main content

Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009535.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suetonia C Palmer, Andrew R Palmer, Jonathan C Craig, David W Johnson, Paul Stroumza, Luc Frantzen, Miguel Leal, Susanne Hoischen, Jorgen Hegbrant, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Abstract

Home haemodialysis is associated with improved survival and quality of life in uncontrolled studies. However, relative benefits and harms of home versus in-centre haemodialysis in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 21%
Student > Master 21 19%
Unspecified 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 25%
Unspecified 16 14%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,435,454
of 13,589,098 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,236
of 10,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,773
of 298,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,589,098 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.