You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of a minimal sedation protocol using ICU sedative consumption as a monitoring tool: a quality improvement multicenter project
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-014-0580-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Otavio T Ranzani, Evelyn Senna Simpson, Talita Barbosa Augusto, Sylas Bezerra Cappi, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi |
Abstract |
Oversedation frequently occurs in ICUs. We aimed to evaluate a minimal sedation policy, using sedative consumption as a monitoring tool, in a network of ICUs targeting decrement of oversedation and mechanical ventilation (MV) duration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Other | 22 | 28% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 24% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,381
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,870
of 274,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#120
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.