You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Motivational interviewing interactions and the primary health care challenges presented by smokers with low motivation to stop smoking: a conversation analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1225 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Núria Codern-Bové, Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera, Margarida Pla, Javier González-Bonilla, Silvia Granollers, José L Ballvé, Gemma Fanlo, Carmen Cabezas, ISTAPS Study Group |
Abstract |
Research indicates that one third of smokers have low motivation to stop smoking. The purpose of the study was to use Conversational Analysis to enhance understanding of the process in Motivational Interviewing sessions carried out by primary care doctors and nurses to motivate their patients to quit smoking. The present study is a substudy of the Systematic Intervention on Smoking Habits in Primary Health Care Project (Spanish acronym: ISTAPS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 3% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 117 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 25% |
Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 15% |
Psychology | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,067,657
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,125
of 14,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,502
of 361,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#129
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.