↓ Skip to main content

Lack of protocols for handling missing sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in depression trials: what are the risks of neglecting missing sessions?

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lack of protocols for handling missing sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in depression trials: what are the risks of neglecting missing sessions?
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rivadávio F Amorim, Monique Gomes da Silva Scalco, Maria Cecília de Freitas-Ferrari, Tiago Freitas, Heitor Moreno, Aline Patrícia Brietzke, Joaquim Brasil-Neto

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 18%
Neuroscience 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#21,261,350
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#717
of 915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,053
of 426,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.