↓ Skip to main content

The role of learning and coordination in strength training

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
348 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of learning and coordination in strength training
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf00422902
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. M. Rutherford, D. A. Jones

Abstract

The central changes associated with a period of strength training have been investigated in a group of 32 young healthy volunteers. Subjects participated in one of three 12 week training programmes, which required different degrees of skill and coordination. Study 1 consisted of unilateral isometric training of the quadriceps with the contralateral leg acting as a control, the apparatus providing firm back support and a lap strap. In Study 2 training consisted of unilateral concentric leg-extension with back support and hand-grips. In Study 3 subjects performed bilateral leg-extension with no back support. Measurements of maximum voluntary isometric strength were made at 2-3 week intervals and a continual record was kept of the weights lifted in Studies 2 and 3. The largest increase in isometric force was seen for the trained leg in Study 1 (approximately 40%). There was no significant change in strength in the contralateral untrained leg. In Studies 2 and 3 there was a large increase in training weights (about 200%) associated with smaller increase in isometric force (15-20%). It is concluded that a large part of the improvement in the ability to lift weights was due to an increased ability to coordinate other muscle groups involved in the movement such as those used to stabilise the body. The importance of these findings for athletic training and rehabilitation is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 259 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 113 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Neuroscience 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 67 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,519,894
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#484
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148
of 10,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.