↓ Skip to main content

Combined ultrasonic aspiration and saline-linked radiofrequency precoagulation: a step toward bloodless liver resection without the need of liver inflow occlusion: analysis of 313 consecutive patients.

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined ultrasonic aspiration and saline-linked radiofrequency precoagulation: a step toward bloodless liver resection without the need of liver inflow occlusion: analysis of 313 consecutive patients.
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-12-357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felekuras E, Petrou A, Neofytou K, Giakoustidis A, Bagenal J, Cananzi F, Pikoulis E, Mudan S

Abstract

Hemorrhage is undoubtedly one of the main factors contributing to morbidity and mortality in liver resections. Vascular occlusion techniques are effective in controlling intraoperative bleeding, but they cause liver damage due to ischemia. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of using a combined technique for hepatic parenchymal transection without liver inflow occlusion.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 25%
Professor 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Unspecified 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,459,564
of 5,329,056 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#188
of 1,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,589
of 180,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#35
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,329,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 51st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.