↓ Skip to main content

Role of omics techniques in the toxicity testing of nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of omics techniques in the toxicity testing of nanoparticles
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12951-017-0320-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleonore Fröhlich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 14%
Engineering 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Chemistry 9 8%
Other 31 26%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#851
of 1,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,634
of 452,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,991 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.