You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Checking and Handling Inconsistency of DBpedia
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 60 |
Book title |
Web Information Systems and Mining
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-33469-6_60 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-233468-9, 978-3-64-233469-6
|
Authors |
Zhaohua Sheng, Xin Wang, Hong Shi, Zhiyong Feng, Sheng, Zhaohua, Wang, Xin, Shi, Hong, Feng, Zhiyong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 10 | 91% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,523,397
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,489
of 8,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,400
of 183,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#17
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.