↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008194.pub3
Pubmed ID
25425010
Authors

Liying Jia, Beibei Yuan, Fei Huang, Ying Lu, Paul Garner, Qingyue Meng

Abstract

Health insurance has the potential to improve access to health care and protect people from the financial risks of diseases. However, health insurance coverage is often low, particularly for people most in need of protection, including children and other vulnerable populations.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 315 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 18%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 61 19%
Unknown 84 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 15%
Social Sciences 29 9%
Psychology 15 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 3%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 92 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,944,793
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,563
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,668
of 361,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#208
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.