The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long‐term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the development of gastric pre‐malignant lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010623.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huan Song, Jianwei Zhu, DongHao Lu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 25% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Grenada | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 13% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 64 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,171,960
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,249
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,563
of 372,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.