↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Indication for Computed Tomography During Hepatic Arteriography (CTHA) in Addition to Dynamic CT Studies to Identify Hypervascularity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Indication for Computed Tomography During Hepatic Arteriography (CTHA) in Addition to Dynamic CT Studies to Identify Hypervascularity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00270-017-1832-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoyo Fuji, Yuko Nakamura, Wataru Fukumoto, Kenji Kajiwara, Keigo Chosa, Chihiro Tani, Yoshiko Matsubara, Hiroaki Terada, Yukiko Honda, Koji Arihiro, Makoto Iida, Yasutaka Baba, Kazuo Awai

Abstract

To identify factors benefiting from computed tomography during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) in addition to dynamic CT studies at the preoperative evaluation of the hypervascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively divided 45 patients with HCC, who underwent both dynamic CT (dCT) and CTHA, into two groups based on the number of hypervascular HCCs identified on dCT and CTHA studies. In group A, the number of HCCs identified by dCT and CTHA was the same and additive CTHA had not been indicated. In group B, fewer HCCs were counted on dCT than on CTHA images, indicating that additive CTHA studies had been appropriate. We compared the patient characteristics, the serum alpha-fetoprotein level, and the tumor-liver contrast (TLC) of the main tumor on dCT scans of both groups. To identify factors alerting to the benefit of additional CTHA studies, we performed univariate logistic regression analysis. Statistically significant parameters were subjected to receiver operating characteristic analysis for obtaining the optimal cutoff value indicative of the benefit of CTHA. Univariate analysis identified only the TLC of the main tumor on dCT images as a significant factor for the benefit of CTHA images (P < 0.01). At the optimal cutoff value for the TLC of the main tumor on dCT images (15.9 Hounsfield units), the sensitivity and specificity for the benefit of CTHA were 85.0 and 92.0%, respectively. Evaluation of the TLC of the main tumor on dCT scans identifies patients in whom additive CTHA studies are beneficial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,959,314
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1,512
of 2,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,802
of 329,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#35
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.