↓ Skip to main content

Complex host genetics influence the microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,584)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
349 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
508 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complex host genetics influence the microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
Genome Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13073-014-0107-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Knights, Mark S Silverberg, Rinse K Weersma, Dirk Gevers, Gerard Dijkstra, Hailiang Huang, Andrea D Tyler, Suzanne van Sommeren, Floris Imhann, Joanne M Stempak, Hu Huang, Pajau Vangay, Gabriel A Al-Ghalith, Caitlin Russell, Jenny Sauk, Jo Knight, Mark J Daly, Curtis Huttenhower, Ramnik J Xavier

Abstract

Human genetics and host-associated microbial communities have been associated independently with a wide range of chronic diseases. One of the strongest associations in each case is inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but disease risk cannot be explained fully by either factor individually. Recent findings point to interactions between host genetics and microbial exposures as important contributors to disease risk in IBD. These include evidence of the partial heritability of the gut microbiota and the conferral of gut mucosal inflammation by microbiome transplant even when the dysbiosis was initially genetically derived. Although there have been several tests for association of individual genetic loci with bacterial taxa, there has been no direct comparison of complex genome-microbiome associations in large cohorts of patients with an immunity-related disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 486 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 20%
Researcher 100 20%
Student > Master 57 11%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Other 27 5%
Other 82 16%
Unknown 88 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 160 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 7%
Computer Science 15 3%
Other 47 9%
Unknown 104 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#300,469
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#47
of 1,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,312
of 365,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.