You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A tailored multicomponent program to reduce discomfort in critically ill patients: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-017-4991-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre Kalfon, Karine Baumstarck, Philippe Estagnasie, Marie-Agnès Geantot, Audrey Berric, Georges Simon, Bernard Floccard, Thomas Signouret, Mohamed Boucekine, Mélanie Fromentin, Martine Nyunga, Achille Sossou, Marion Venot, René Robert, Arnaud Follin, Juliette Audibert, Anne Renault, Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas, Olivier Collange, Quentin Levrat, Isabelle Villard, Didier Thevenin, Julien Pottecher, René-Gilles Patrigeon, Nathalie Revel, Coralie Vigne, Elie Azoulay, Olivier Mimoz, Pascal Auquier, on behalf of the IPREA Study group |
| Abstract |
Critically ill patients are exposed to stressful conditions and experience several discomforts. The primary objective was to assess whether a tailored multicomponent program is effective for reducing self-perceived discomfort. In a cluster-randomized two-arm parallel trial, 34 French adult intensive care units (ICUs) without planned interventions to reduce discomfort were randomized, 17 to the arm including a 6-month period of program implementation followed by a 6-month period without the program (experimental group), and 17 to the arm with an inversed sequence (control group). The tailored multicomponent program consisted of assessment of ICU-related self-perceived discomforts, immediate and monthly feedback to healthcare teams, and site-specific tailored interventions. The primary outcome was the overall discomfort score derived from the 16-item IPREA questionnaire (0, minimal, 100, maximal overall discomfort) and the secondary outcomes were the discomfort scores of each IPREA item. IPREA was administered on the day of ICU discharge with a considered timeframe from the ICU admission until ICU discharge. During a 1-month assessment period, 398 and 360 patients were included in the experimental group and the control group, respectively. The difference (experimental minus control) of the overall discomfort score between groups was - 7.00 (95% CI - 9.89 to - 4.11, p < 0.001). After adjustment (age, gender, ICU duration, mechanical ventilation duration, and type of admission), the program effect was still positive for the overall discomfort score (difference - 6.35, SE 1.23, p < 0.001) and for 12 out of 16 items. This tailored multicomponent program decreased self-perceived discomfort in adult critically ill patients. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02442934. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 67% |
| Scientists | 8 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,450,301
of 24,962,233 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,278
of 5,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,549
of 450,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#37
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,962,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.