@HMcJeon3y4 @Peters_Glen @JKikstra I disagree, it is the other way around. Since 1.5C is not explicitly defined as 'no overshoot' target, it is of course allowed under PA. In this perspective 2100 and 0.1C are actually constraints, even if rather weak ones
8,578 followers
8,578 followers
@Peters_Glen well, this will be one of the main #climate policy questions as we approach 1.5C threshold crossing in 2030s, as estimated in IPCC WG I. There's still not much research literature on this although eminent researchers have been asking for it so
8,578 followers
@theresphysics -50% by 2030 is from set of pathways w/ budget&temp overshoot (OS), can only be considered 1.5C-compliant when you extend timeframe to 2100. Once you do that, you got a flexible deadline unless you set hard OS limits 1.5C w/o OS more li
2,949 followers
RT @Oliver_Geden: Removing "by 2100" for 1.5C goal might be well-intended but would in fact remove any constraint by when return from likel…