↓ Skip to main content

Training Pediatric Psychologists for Perinatal Behavioral Health Services in a Pediatric Hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training Pediatric Psychologists for Perinatal Behavioral Health Services in a Pediatric Hospital
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10880-015-9439-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhonda C. Boyd, Alexander M. Scharko, Joanna C. M. Cole, Chavis A. Patterson, Tami D. Benton, Thomas J. Power

Abstract

Although pediatric hospitals specialize in providing care to children and adolescents, at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), our team has been providing behavioral health services for two unique parent populations-parents with a child in the Newborn Infant Intensive Care Unit and pregnant women carrying fetuses with specific birth defects and receiving prenatal care in the Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment. A new training program was developed to expand the scope of pediatric psychologists' practice to include perinatal behavioral health services, specifically for these two unique parent populations served at CHOP. The program includes direct service provision for adult mental health concerns, as well as education and support to help families cope with the existing medical conditions. This article describes the training program and its implementation as a model of training for other pediatric hospitals. The roles of psychologists embedded in these units and hospital privileges are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 32%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,882,258
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#266
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,841
of 285,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.