↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Brief Intervention Targeting Anxiety Sensitivity Cognitive Concerns

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Brief Intervention Targeting Anxiety Sensitivity Cognitive Concerns
Published in
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, January 2014
DOI 10.1037/a0036651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norman B. Schmidt, Daniel W. Capron, Amanda M. Raines, Nicholas P. Allan

Abstract

Anxiety sensitivity (AS) is a well-established, malleable risk factor for anxiety and other forms of psychopathology. Structural evaluation models of AS suggest it can be decomposed into physical, social, and cognitive concerns, and emerging work indicates that these components may be differentially related to various adverse outcomes. In particular, AS cognitive concerns have been consistently linked with suicide. Prior work has also shown that brief interventions can effectively reduce overall AS, but these treatments tend to focus on its physical subcomponent. The aim of the current investigation was to design and evaluate the efficacy of an AS treatment more specifically focused on its cognitive component.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 176 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 15%
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,719,136
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#343
of 4,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,994
of 319,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#16
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.