↓ Skip to main content

Surgical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006990.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rishi Sharma, Raj Lakhani, Joanne Rimmer, Claire Hopkins

Abstract

Surgical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is an established treatment for medically resistant nasal polyp disease. Whether a nasal polypectomy with additional sinus dissection offers any advantage over an isolated nasal polypectomy has not been systematically reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 42 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Computer Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 49 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,335,069
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,896
of 13,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,575
of 374,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#199
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.