↓ Skip to main content

Randomised Trial of Text Messaging on Adherence to Cardiovascular Preventive Treatment (INTERACT Trial)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
42 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomised Trial of Text Messaging on Adherence to Cardiovascular Preventive Treatment (INTERACT Trial)
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0114268
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Wald, Jonathan P. Bestwick, Lewis Raiman, Rebecca Brendell, Nicholas J. Wald

Abstract

About one third of patients prescribed blood pressure or lipid-lowering drugs for the prevention of coronary heart disease and stroke do not take their medication as prescribed. We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate text messaging as a means of improving adherence to cardiovascular disease preventive treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 218 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 22%
Psychology 27 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 56 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#369,402
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,244
of 220,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,125
of 364,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#94
of 3,959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.