You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Needs-based human resources for health planning in Jamaica: using simulation modelling to inform policy options for pharmacists in the public sector
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-12-67 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gail Tomblin Murphy, Adrian MacKenzie, Joan Guy-Walker, Claudette Walker |
Abstract |
Planning for human resources for health (HRH) is central to health systems strengthening around the world, including in the Caribbean and Jamaica. In an effort to align Jamaica's health workforce with the changing health needs of its people, a partnership was established between Jamaican and Canadian partners. The purpose of the work described in this paper is to describe the development and application of a needs-based HRH simulation model for pharmacists in Jamaica's largest health region. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 40% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Rwanda | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
Researcher | 15 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 19% |
Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 38 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,308,946
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#603
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,092
of 367,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.