↓ Skip to main content

Age Correction in Dementia – Matching to a Healthy Brain

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age Correction in Dementia – Matching to a Healthy Brain
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juergen Dukart, Matthias L. Schroeter, Karsten Mueller

Abstract

In recent research, many univariate and multivariate approaches have been proposed to improve automatic classification of various dementia syndromes using imaging data. Some of these methods do not provide the possibility to integrate possible confounding variables like age into the statistical evaluation. A similar problem sometimes exists in clinical studies, as it is not always possible to match different clinical groups to each other in all confounding variables, like for example, early-onset (age<65 years) and late-onset (age≥65) patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we propose a simple method to control for possible effects of confounding variables such as age prior to statistical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data using support vector machine classification (SVM) or voxel-based morphometry (VBM). We compare SVM results for the classification of 80 AD patients and 79 healthy control subjects based on MRI data with and without prior age correction. Additionally, we compare VBM results for the comparison of three different groups of AD patients differing in age with the same group of control subjects obtained without including age as covariate, with age as covariate or with prior age correction using the proposed method. SVM classification using the proposed method resulted in higher between-group classification accuracy compared to uncorrected data. Further, applying the proposed age correction substantially improved univariate detection of disease-related grey matter atrophy using VBM in AD patients differing in age from control subjects. The results suggest that the approach proposed in this work is generally suited to control for confounding variables such as age in SVM or VBM analyses. Accordingly, the approach might improve and extend the application of these methods in clinical neurosciences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Italy 2 1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 144 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 24%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Psychology 17 11%
Computer Science 12 8%
Engineering 12 8%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,385,510
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,549
of 194,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,075
of 119,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,778
of 2,285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.